Sunday, November 22, 2015

If God Were a Scientist..!

... then he'd be the best of them all, right?

Since research is at the core of everything I do, and since my belief in God is a lifestyle deeply embeded into my system, it's only natural for me to think of our Heavenly Father as an all-knowing, all powerful and omnipresent supreme being AND the ultimate scientist of the universe.

So, if God has reached the point of knowing all things, then he certainly has reached this point himself both by (1) growing in knowledge through faith and also through (2) knowledge by logical scientific deduction.

It also means that he has explored every possible aspect of how each one of us may best be taught and brought through the very same process of learning like him, for this is his expressed desire for all his spirit children (Moses 1:39).

In short, his design is both religious and scientific, or in other words, true religion as well as science comes from and is inspired of God as tools to elevate all of us - to individually and collectively excel in knowledge and understanding of eternal truth and order.



Are We a Divine Experiment?
Which then brings us back to the original question: If God were a scientist, how would he use scientific principles to design the perfect growth experiment most worthwhile doing?

First, I am not saying we are an experiment. Why not? Because if we are to suppose that God is the scientist from which all science flows, then he would also know the final outcome of every experiment or test we could ever concoct. No, as Einstein put it, "God does not play dice".

Secondly, as God himself has pointed out in Doctrine & Covenants 18:15-16, an individual soul is the greatest source of happiness. Nothing surpasses the joy of helping one person to eternal bliss. Thus we might expect the scientific and divine effort to be focused singularly on saving as many of his children as possible.

What Might a Divine Science Project Look Like?
So what is the "experiment"? An experiment with a known successful outcome?

It's his plan of salvation. It's the creation of the earth and the miracle of all miracles that Jesus Christ somehow is able to pay for all the mistakes we make during our growth process in this most sublime laboratory we call "earth".

From a scientific point of view, here are merely a few examples of principles any good scientist would adhere to, if he or she wants to successfully conduct research. Would it seem fair to suggest that God applies these very same principles?
  1. Start with a clearly defined problem / question / hypothesis. (In our case; Who are you? Are you a good person? What talents or traits, qualities or characteristics define you? How can we bring out the real you, the best in you? Is it true that you really want the good?)
  2. Eliminate all bias. Do not manipulate or interfere. Offer real choice. (In our case; We have free agency. We can choose without being forced to do anything against our own will. If God were to show himself to us, where would choice be?)
  3. Do not judge or conclude prematurely. Give it time and test more than once. (In our case; Life itself is not one, but a series of infinite tests that over time reveal, even statistically, true identity and desires. How fortunate we are to not be judged for one or two instances of failure. How merciful a doctor our supreme guardian is.)
  4. Test in every possible dimension. Gather data. Document everything. (In our case; Are we not being interviewed? Are we not being observed? Are we not surveyed? Where is data stored? Are we not living books being recorded - words, actions, thoughts..?)
  5. Create as realistic conditions a possible. (In our case; Does any of us even know we're being tested? Can anyone doubt the reality of life? Can you see or sense the brilliance of it all? One needs only look up at the sky and watch the stars, or even down on a flower or insect to feel the enormity of creation.)
  6. Make sure the candidate being tested does not know he or she is being tested or observed. (In our case; If ever there was a question of the need for faith, it would be the scientific principle that underscores the requirement to put a veil between the observer and the observed.)
  7. Establish test outcomes with witnesses. (In our case; Is anyone able to conquer alone? Was life ever a matter of winning only when others lose? The interdependent nature of life seems to emphasize the importance of lifting each other. Indeed we are witnesses for each other. As in a court of law, anything stands more firm when one or more witnesses can corroborate facts.)
I could bring up many more, but let' not to dilute the idea behind these examples...

When people tell me it's hard to believe God is behind everything we see around us, I keep thinking: "We are in the middle of the most perfect testing lab ever created. Would you not want to pass through it successfully in line with its original design an purpose? I know I do."





3 comments:

  1. I'm interested then, and please do not take this as antagonistic, when you say "First, I am not saying we are an experiment. Why not? Because if we are to suppose that God is the scientist from which all science flows, then he would also know the final outcome of every experiment or test we could ever concoct", how do you view additions to the old testament, such as the new testament or the book of mormon? I see an obvious logical disconnect in the description of an infallible god.

    ReplyDelete